Baker Newby Black & White Logo
  • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • What’s New
    • Our Community
  • Business Services
    • Agriculture
    • Business Financing
    • Business Structures
    • Purchases, Sales and Other Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Dispute Resolution
    • Construction Law
    • Contracts and Other Legal Documents
    • Employment Law
    • Land Transactions
    • Indigenous Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Succession Planning
  • Dispute Resolution
    • Negotiation Services
    • Mediation Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Parenting Coordinator
  • Personal Services
    • Family Law
    • Estate and Wealth Preservation Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Litigation
    • Criminal Defence Law
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Disability Insurance
    • Slip and Fall
  • Blog
  • Mediators
  • Career Opportunities
Menu
  • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • What’s New
    • Our Community
  • Business Services
    • Agriculture
    • Business Financing
    • Business Structures
    • Purchases, Sales and Other Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Dispute Resolution
    • Construction Law
    • Contracts and Other Legal Documents
    • Employment Law
    • Land Transactions
    • Indigenous Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Succession Planning
  • Dispute Resolution
    • Negotiation Services
    • Mediation Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Parenting Coordinator
  • Personal Services
    • Family Law
    • Estate and Wealth Preservation Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Litigation
    • Criminal Defence Law
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Disability Insurance
    • Slip and Fall
  • Blog
  • Mediators
  • Career Opportunities
Contact Us

Chilliwack Office
P.O. Box 390, 9259 Main Street, Chilliwack, BC V2P 6K2
(604) 792-1376 

Abbotsford Office
200 – 2955 Gladwin Rd,
Abbotsford BC V2T 5T4
(604) 852-3646

©2020 Baker Newby
Full-Service Lawyers.
All rights reserved.

Baker Newby Black & White Logo
  • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • What’s New
    • Our Community
  • Business Services
    • Agriculture
    • Business Financing
    • Business Structures
    • Purchases, Sales and Other Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Dispute Resolution
    • Construction Law
    • Contracts and Other Legal Documents
    • Employment Law
    • Land Transactions
    • Indigenous Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Succession Planning
  • Dispute Resolution
    • Negotiation Services
    • Mediation Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Parenting Coordinator
  • Personal Services
    • Family Law
    • Estate and Wealth Preservation Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Litigation
    • Criminal Defence Law
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Disability Insurance
    • Slip and Fall
  • Blog
  • Mediators
  • Career Opportunities
Menu
  • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • What’s New
    • Our Community
  • Business Services
    • Agriculture
    • Business Financing
    • Business Structures
    • Purchases, Sales and Other Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Dispute Resolution
    • Construction Law
    • Contracts and Other Legal Documents
    • Employment Law
    • Land Transactions
    • Indigenous Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Succession Planning
  • Dispute Resolution
    • Negotiation Services
    • Mediation Services
    • Arbitration Services
    • Litigation Strategy
    • Parenting Coordinator
  • Personal Services
    • Family Law
    • Estate and Wealth Preservation Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Litigation
    • Criminal Defence Law
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Privacy Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Disability Insurance
    • Slip and Fall
  • Blog
  • Mediators
  • Career Opportunities

Court of Appeal Decision Regarding s.211 Reports By Cristen Gleeson

Family Law
December 7, 2020
Loading...

Section 211 reports are court ordered reports completed by an independent and impartial investigator. Section 211 reports assess the needs and views of a child in relation to a family law dispute, and the ability and willingness of a party to a family law dispute to satisfy the needs of a child. A person appointed under Section 211 must be a family justice counsellor, a social worker or another person approved by the court. A person who carries out an assessment under Section 211 must prepare a report respecting the results of their assessment, give a copy of the report to each party, and give a copy of the report to the court.

Section 211 reports permit the court to understand what is in a child’s best interests. They also allow the court to be not only familiar with the current social science respecting child development, but also an appropriate route to take when determining a case. Section 211 recommendations are informed by testing, observations and interviews of all the relevant people involved in a family law proceeding. The court; however, is not obliged to accept the opinions or recommendations of a Section 211 report; the court will not abandon its role as the final decision-maker.

In M.F.W. v. M.A.H., 2020 BCCA 284, the British Columbia Court of Appeal recently reviewed the law surrounding Section 211 reports. In particular, the appellant father argued the court was required, as a matter of law, to follow the recommendations of an assessor appointed under Section 211 unless the assessor had been cross-examined at trial. The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury rejected the appellant father’s argument and affirmed that judges should not abandon their decision-making roles in favour of an assessor’s recommendations. Newbury J.A. further rejected the argument that a litigant who opposed an assessor’s report was obliged to cross-examine them. She noted that each party’s right to call the assessor to the witness stand was an “opportunity” – not an “obligation”. In light of an assessor’s report, the trial judge remains best suited to hear evidence with which they can ‘assess’ and determine a child’s best interests to reach different conclusions.

Related Posts

Dissecting Section 85 of the BC Family Law Act: The Exclusionary Clause

Imagine this: Veena’s eight-year marriage with Tom has now come to an end and they have been separated for over

Read More »
May 18, 2022

Evolving Family Dynamics: British Columbia Courts Recognize More than two Parents under the Family Law Act – by Cristen Gleeson and Emily Milne

Evolving Family Dynamics in BC In a recent decision of the BC Supreme Court, British Columbia Birth Registration No. 2018-XX-XX5815, 2021

Read More »
May 14, 2021

Pre-nuptial Agreements by Cristen Gleeson

Will your prenuptial agreement stand up to a court challenge? The BC Court of Appeal recently revisited this issue in

Read More »
March 1, 2021
Baker Newby Black & White Logo

Get our newsletter delivered to your inbox.

How Can We Help You?

Get Connected

Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin-in Instagram
Contact Us
Search
Close

© 2022 Baker Newby Full-Service Lawyers. All rights reserved. 

Privacy Policy | Designed by Jelly Digital Marketing & PR